Page 7 - Corporate Health Check

Decision Management II:

Governance

My organization possesses a body of approaches addressing
governance issues such as assessing - and reducing negative
1)
impact of - unforeseen effects of decisions made and mitigating agree disagree don’t know
impact of unforeseen events on corporate performance

Our organization does ensure that these approaches and resulting
methods and processes are routinely assessed as of scope,
2)
relevance and effectiveness and forces appropriate action to be agree disagree don’t know
taken

My organization has methods in place that ensure that the
decision making process routinely assesses the impact of decisions
3)
on different aspects of the enterprise other than the direct object agree disagree don’t know
of the decision before the decision is finalized
The decision making process in my organization is continuously
improved as of quality of results, mitigation of unwanted side
4)
effects, and that underlying assumptions are routinely questioned agree disagree don’t know
and re-evaluated

My organization has a routine method that assesses its culture
as of encouraging challenges to ‘status quo’, absence of
5)
discrimination and prejudice, as well as emergence of the ‘Lucifer agree disagree don’t know
effect’ and requires appropriate actions to be taken

My organization has a method for ensuring that all governance
approaches and resulting methods and processes are routinely
6)
reviewed as of scope, relevance and effectiveness and that agree disagree don’t know
underlying assumptions are questioned.

My organization has a routine method that assesses whether its
7) culture allows dissent, and values general diversity of opinions agree disagree don’t know
without negative effect to sources of origin and forces appropriate
action to be taken.

8) My organization has a routine method to ensure all decision
making is placed into hands only of competent people and that agree disagree don’t know
accountability, but expressly not blame, is enforced.

We have an effective approach that encourages devolution of
9)
decision making and uses routine challenges to the ‘status quo’ as agree disagree don’t know
well as system learning to continuously improve the quality
of the decision making process at all levels.

10) Most people (>87%) would judge my organization’s governance agree disagree don’t know
approaches as effective and as positive.

11) Our organization has a reviewed approach that ensures its culture agree disagree don’t know
is ring-fenced by a set of shared values, not rules and policies.

Version 9.0 6/19 © 1995-2019 TWC Consulting Group
All Rights reserved